 |
Multivariate
analyses of the concordance between environmental
variables and growth in smallmouth bass populations
Multivariate statistics were
used to assess the concordance between climate and
growth variables in 125 North American populations
of smallmouth bass. Patterns in the growth-climate
relationships were compared between native and introduced
populations.
Methods
- Principal components analysis (PCA) was performed
separately on the climate and growth data using a
correlation matrix (Figure 1).
A Procrustes analysis was run with the scores of the
first two principal components for both the climate
and growth PCAs as inputs. The first two PCA components
were used as inputs to the Procrustes analysis in
order to reduce the multiple, often correlated variables
down to two independent variables that explain most
of the variation.
A Procrustes test is used to
analyze the concordance between two data sets (climate
and growth in this case). In a Procrustes analysis,
one of the data configurations (i.e., the climate
matrix) is rotated and scaled against a reference
configuration (i.e., the growth matrix) until the
residual sum-of-squares is minimized. To evaluate
the significance of the Procrustes rotation and the
concordance between the climate and growth datasets,
we used the Procrustes randomization test PROTEST
(Jackson 1995).
Results
- Positive relationships were found between air temperatures
and growth at earlier ages, while growth at later
ages was less influenced by climate. The concordance
between climate and growth was higher for native populations
than for introduced populations. Procrustes superimposition
plots indicated interesting contrasts between native
and introduced Ontario populations (Figure
2). The residual vectors had clumped apexes in
both native and introduced populations but the clump
for the native populations was located close to the
origin while the clump for the introduced populations
was located well above and to the left of the origin
(Figure 2). This indicated
a similar within category (i.e., native or introduced)
climate but a different between category climate.
This difference in climate between native and introduced
populations was probably related to the more northern
distribution of introduced relative to native populations
in Ontario. The orientation of native Ontario residual
vectors was more varied than that of the introduced
populations, which were generally oriented in directions
opposite to those defined by the early growth vectors
(Figure 2). This indicated
a varied growth response in native populations but
generally faster observed growth in many of the introduced
populations than was predicted by their climate characteristics.

Figure 1.
Results of a principal components analysis (PCA)
of smallmouth bass climate and growth data. Panel
(a) presents variable scores (i.e. correlations)
for a PCA of climate data (SumTemp = summer temperature,
DD10 = ln transformed degree days above 10oC,
and MaxTemp, MeanTemp, and MinTemp = the maximum,
mean, and minimum temperatures, respectively.
Panel (b) shows the variable scores for the PCA
of growth data. Age 1, Age 2, Age 3, Age 4 are
growth increments for ages 1 through 4, respectively.
Reproduced from Dunlop and Shuter
(2006).

Figure 2.
PROTEST residuals of smallmouth bass populations
in Ontario. Panel (a) shows a Procrustes superimposition
plot for native populations. The arrows in the
primary plot represent the magnitude (length of
arrow) and direction of PROTEST residuals for
individual populations (the origin of each arrow
represents the observed position of the population
in the growth matrix while the arrowhead represents
the position of the population in the configured
climate matrix). The insert shows the growth vectors
from the PCA (reading from top to bottom, growth
at ages 4, 3, 2, and 1). The arrows in the primary
plot moving away from the growth vectors in the
insert indicate growth that is faster than that
predicted by climate. Other panels are as follows:
(b) Procrustes superimposition plot for introduced
populations. (c) frequency distribution of PROTEST
residual vector direction for native populations
(the insert illustrates quadrant assignments –
A, B, C, D – based on the direction of the
residual vector), and (d) frequency distribution
of the PROTEST residual vector direction for introduced
populations. Reproduced from Dunlop
and Shuter (2006).
References
Dunlop, E.S., and Shuter, B.J.
2006. Native and introduced populations of smallmouth
bass differ in the concordance between climate and
somatic growth. Transactions of the American Fisheries
Society 135:1175-1190.
Jackson, D. A. 1995. PROTEST:
A PROcrustean Randomization TEST of community environment
concordance. Ecoscience 2:297-303.
|
 |
|